Hello all. Just a quickie for those who have taken the lab. Is the link below the exact page we'll be taken to? Just want to make sure as I've made this my home page to force me to practice searching topics on Cisco's site.
https://www.cisco.com/cisco/web/psa/default.html
Thanks!
Primary Secondary Type Ports
------- --------- ----------------- ------------------------------------------
4000 4001 non-operational
4000 4002 non-operational
* vlan 4001 & 4002 saying not operational insteady of isoleted ad community.
Lab in question:
http://labs.ine.com/workbook/view/rs-v5-workbook/task/ospf-reliable-conditional-default-routing-MjE1MA%3D%3D
My question is: How is R8 advertising a default route, if the default-information originate always key-word isn't used?
When I attempted this lab, I simply created a default route to null0 and put the track there. In this case, the router has a default route when the track is up, and advertises the default. When the default is gone (track down) then it retracts the advertised default.
With the lab, how would this work?
When is the New CCIE workbook suppose to be release?
Hi there,
I've just wasted a lab session trying to find the switch configuration for v5 Adv Tech Wookbook. I'm trying to do the IPSec VPN and DMVPN labs. I have found the configuration files for routers R1 to R10 (dmvpn and ipsec.vpn) but where are the switches SW1 to SW4 configurations???
I did find basic.layer2.switching folder, but these do not contain any vlan information. Found lan.switching.initial.vtp folder but it's missing some vlans (23, 37, 45, 100 and 108). Found lan.switching.initial.spanning.tree folder and again it's missing those vlans again.
Any help would be appreicated. Thanks in advanced.
James.
Hi All,
Loading the IPsec VPN initial configs
I noticed that there isn'nt reachability between these devices ( R3, R6, R5 ) and (R10 , R9 's loopback).
Any insight into this ?
Thanks
Good evening,
Why do you need to import/export RTs for sites that have same RD/VRF in order to allow them to communicate with eachother? For example, say that you have two customers, 1 and 2, and two sites per customer, A, B, C, and D. Each site has its own PE-CE connection that goes into the MPLS “core”.
Customer 1 has sites A and B with an RD of 1:1.
Customer 2 has sites C and D with an RD of 1:2.
My understanding is that in order to get sites A/B to communicate with each other, one would need to use RTs to import/export 1:1. The same would be true in order to get sites C/D to communicate with each other.
If sites A/B share the same RD, how come routes advertised by each site are not implicitly imported into the VRFs of their respective sites PE routers? For example, when site A advertises a route to its PE, and that PE advertises the route to the site B PE, without the RTs setup, the site B PE will not import the site A PE learned route even though the RD is the same as a locally configured VRF.
Are RDs of local significance only and RTs of global significance? That is the only thing I can come up with that makes sense for the aforementioned behavior.
Thank you for your input.
Hi,
I am starting my CCIE studies and would like to maybe share sone notes, questions etc with someone (GMT). Anyone intereseted, please let me know.
I am going to buy a rack server to run a baremetal hypervisor and replicate the lab topology shown in the workbook for v5. I will run CSR100V routers and I have four 3750 switches I plan to connect to it.
The only question I have is: Does anyone have recommendations on the specifications for the server hardware itself? i'm looking for info on number and type of processors, HHD capacity, RAM requirements. I can put ESXi v5.5 on it and use vCenter to manage it, but want to make sure I spec out the server hardware correctly.
Hi all!
Props to user sdallspach (Steven) for creating this.
From any tab press F9 to generate a new list randomly. This is currently based off the labs that aren't pending updates.
Hello everyone, passed the SP lab yesterday in San Jose! Here are a few takeways for those pursuing.
1. Don't give up. This was my third attempt. Persistence pays.
2. INE workbooks and videos are key.
3. Have a strategy and stick to it.
4. Draw diagrams. I had two diagrams. One with unicast IPV4/IPV6 peerings. One with VPNv4/VPNV6 peerings. It kind of gets muddy when you try and cram int all on one page.
5. Use TCL scripts to test reachability for everything. This saves a lot of time.
6. Focus on getting core working correctly first. If the core isn't right, nothing will work on top of it.
7. Save your IOS configs often.
I'm currently working on the 802.1Q Native VLAN lab (http://labs.ine.com/workbook/view/rs-v5-workbook/task/802-1q-native-vlan-MTk4Mg%3D%3D ) and seeing behavior I don't understand. Specifically, I do not see STP blocking ports on native VLAN mismatch and my ports are flapping.
I have 4 WS-C3560-24TS switches running 15.0(2)SE C3560-IPSERVICESK9-M. The output of the verification steps for my switches is as follows.
SW1#show int trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/19 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/20 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/21 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/22 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/23 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/24 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/19 1-4094
Fa0/20 1-4094
Fa0/21 1-4094
Fa0/22 1-4094
Fa0/23 1-4094
Fa0/24 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
Fa0/23 1
Fa0/24 1
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
Fa0/23 1
Fa0/24 1
SW2#show int tru
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/23 auto n-802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/24 auto n-802.1q trunking 146
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/23 1-4094
Fa0/24 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/23 1
Fa0/24 1
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/23 1
Fa0/24 none
SW3#show int tru
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/19 auto n-802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/20 auto n-802.1q trunking 146
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/19 1-4094
Fa0/20 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 none
SW4#show int tru
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/21 auto n-802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/22 auto n-802.1q trunking 146
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/21 1-4094
Fa0/22 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 none
When I change the default vlan on SW1 FA0/23 and FA0/24, I get CDP messages indicating native VLAN mismatch, but I do not see messages indicating that STP is blocking for that reason. Show spanning-tree inconsistent ports also shows nothing. However, on SW1 ports FA0/23 and FA0/24 no longer appear as forwarding and not pruned in the show interface trunk output.
SW1#show int trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/19 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/20 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/21 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/22 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/23 desirable 802.1q trunking 1
Fa0/24 desirable 802.1q trunking 1
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/19 1-4094
Fa0/20 1-4094
Fa0/21 1-4094
Fa0/22 1-4094
Fa0/23 1-4094
Fa0/24 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
Fa0/23 1
Fa0/24 1
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
Fa0/23 none
Fa0/24 none
SW1#show ip int bri | inc 23|24
FastEthernet0/23 unassigned YES unset up up
FastEthernet0/24 unassigned YES unset up up
SW1#show sp
SW1#show spanning-tree vlan 1
VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
Root ID Priority 32769
Address 001b.d5df.f480
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32769 (priority 32768 sys-id-ext 1)
Address 001b.d5df.f480
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Aging Time 300 sec
Interface Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
Fa0/1 Desg FWD 19 128.3 P2p
Fa0/19 Desg FWD 19 128.21 P2p
Fa0/20 Desg FWD 19 128.22 P2p
Fa0/21 Desg FWD 19 128.23 P2p
Fa0/22 Desg FWD 19 128.24 P2p
Fa0/23 Desg FWD 19 128.25 P2p
Fa0/24 Desg FWD 19 128.26 P2p
SW1#show spanning-tree vlan 1 int fa0
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/23 (1), with SW2 FastEthernet0/23 (146).
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/24 (1), with SW2 FastEthernet0/24 (146).
SW1#show spanning-tree vlan 1 int fa0/23
Vlan Role Sts Cost Prio.Nbr Type
------------------- ---- --- --------- -------- --------------------------------
VLAN0001 Desg FWD 19 128.25 P2p
SW1#show spanning-tree inconsistentports
Name Interface Inconsistency
-------------------- ------------------------ ------------------
Number of inconsistent ports (segments) in the system : 0
Later, the ports on SW1 start to flap.
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/23 (1), with SW2 FastEthernet0/23 (146).
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/24 (1), with SW2 FastEthernet0/24 (146).
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/23 (1), with SW2 FastEthernet0/23 (146).
%CDP-4-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch discovered on FastEthernet0/24 (1), with SW2 FastEthernet0/24 (146).
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/22, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/21, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/19, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/20, changed state to down
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/22, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/21, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/19, changed state to up
%LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface FastEthernet0/20, changed state to up
SW1#show int trunk
Port Mode Encapsulation Status Native vlan
Fa0/19 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/20 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/21 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Fa0/22 desirable 802.1q trunking 146
Port Vlans allowed on trunk
Fa0/19 1-4094
Fa0/20 1-4094
Fa0/21 1-4094
Fa0/22 1-4094
Port Vlans allowed and active in management domain
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
Port Vlans in spanning tree forwarding state and not pruned
Fa0/19 1
Fa0/20 1
Fa0/21 1
Fa0/22 1
I appreciate any insight you can offer.
Hi,
In the ATC videos related to redistribution, Brian mentioned at one point that there'll be more redistribution scenarios added besides the 3.
Do you know when this will be happening?
Thank you!
Tudor
Unless I'm missing something, I noticed the physical interface on R1, R2, and R5 are not pre-configured with ipv6 addresses when you begin the OSPFv3 Lab in IPv6. I loaded the OSPFv3 Initial configs it says, but OSPF won't come up becase IPV6 is not configured on the link and there is no previous task that tells you to do so.
I am strugling with the initial set up of l2vpn to the ine rack (collaboration) the tunnel seems to be up but i can not ping any of the "11 dot" addresses. i am using the test credentials "coracktest"
router 2821
switch 3750
Router#sh crypto ipsec client ezvpn
Easy VPN Remote Phase: 8
Tunnel name : INECORACK
Inside interface list: Loopback0
Outside interface: GigabitEthernet0/0
Current State: IPSEC_ACTIVE
Last Event: MTU_CHANGED
Save Password: Allowed
Split Tunnel List: 1
Address : 11.0.0.0
Mask : 255.0.0.0
Protocol : 0x0
Source Port: 0
Dest Port : 0
Current EzVPN Peer: 75.140.41.126
Hi guys,
I'm in the process of making a CCNA mindmap, but i was wondering if anyone already did this in the past?
If so, do you create the mindmap as you progress troughout the book, or you do create it when your first completely read it and then go over it again chapter by chapter?
I'm also wondering how detailed i should get this, because i noticed that i'm going fairly deep into this stuff.
Hope to get some usefull info of fellow mindmappers :)
I have debug bgp ipv4 unicast events enabled and every 15 seconds i see a bgp message for a regular scanner event timer. Can someone tell me what this is? it isn't the scantime because that is set at the default of 60 seconds and I see the output of that timer. Just don't understand the scanner event timer and what its purpose is. Thanks.
Hi,
Can anyone please explain me the concept of BGP scan timer? I thought the the scan is to be run every minute. But the debug show a scan running every 15 secs. I haven't changed the timer value from default.
R2#
*Mar 1 01:12:15.679: BGP: Regular scanner event timer
*Mar 1 01:12:15.679: BGP: Import timer expired. Walking from 1 to 1
R2#
*Mar 1 01:12:30.679: BGP: Regular scanner event timer
*Mar 1 01:12:30.679: BGP: Import timer expired. Walking from 1 to 1
R2#
*Mar 1 01:12:45.683: BGP: Regular scanner event timer
*Mar 1 01:12:45.683: BGP: Import timer expired. Walking from 1 to 1
Confused!!!
Does bgp protocol has the facility to do loadbalancing among multiple links....
Also let me know the difference between load balancing and load sharing in bgp .....
Many thanks