Hi all,
I seen in Brian McGahan presentation that a route with feasible succesor will promote it imediatelly to Succesor if the previous Succesor fails.
From what i remember this is not always the case. The true logic would be: after successor fails, find the neighbor providing the next least cost route to destination. If that neighbor is FS, start using it, otherwise enter Active state.
So it not only important to have Feasible Succesor, it is also important that they provide the next best cost to destination.
Is this right?